[CQ-Contest] Re:WPX results vs. SM2EKM claims
Joe Subich, W8IK/4
W8IK at ibm.net
Tue Mar 30 10:53:02 EST 1999
>
> At 08:06 AM 3/30/1999 +0200, SM2EKM wrote:
> >
> >One question: Why should the point structure be different in the
> >North American continent compared to the rest of the world if
> >this is supposed to be a WW contest (also CQWW) ???
> >
>
> To keep us from competing evenly with Europe! To truly level the
> playing field, the rules should divide the United States into regions
> (call-areas?) roughly the size of the major countries of Europe, and
> permit different-country credit for QSOs between them, particularly
> on the low bands.
How about eliminating the country differential? Simply 1 point (or
2 points, take your pick) for QSOs within one's own continent and
3 points (or 5 points, again pick-em) for QSOs with another continent?
Miltipliers ... total band-prefixes. There's still an incentive to
work DX (higher inter-continental points) ...
73,
... Joe Subich, W8IK/4 ex-AD8I
<W8IK at IBM.NET>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list