[CQ-Contest] Multipliers in IARU Contest

[VR2BrettGraham]

YO3CTK wrote:

  The Monaco HQ 3A2K has given during the contest ARM as a control, the
  same as ER7HQ (the Moldavian HQ). Unfortunately, CT is counting just
  one time this multiplier on each band. Shouldn't be actually TWO
  multipliers, from two different HQ ?

By next year's contest, there could be three different ARMs QRV - this is
also the abbreviation for the name of the soon-to-be IARU member-society
of Macau.

I don't think I was so lucky to work 3A2K in this year's contest, but if I 
did I
think I'd just mark one as ARM1 & the other as ARM2 & then make a
comment about it in the summary sheet.

I also often add comments to the summary sheet about stations which
send an exchange which is clearly different than what was expected
(such as for PT2HF as Mike encountered).

73, VR2BrettGraham


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Tom Hellem" <redpines at cybrzn.com  Tue Aug  1 12:25:54 2000
From: Tom Hellem" <redpines at cybrzn.com (Tom Hellem)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 06:25:54 -0500
Subject: [CQ-Contest] naqp multi-two question
Message-ID: <000f01bffbab$41c3e5c0$558ffacf at redpines>


Dear contesters:
We are contemplating the multi class for naqp this weekend. The rules state
"Each transmitter may work any and all stations". Does this mean that after
a station has been worked on one transmitter he may be worked again later on
the same band with the other transmitter? If so, wouldn't the station being
worked for the second time think he was being called by a dupe? Or should
each transmitter use a different call sign?
Hope someone can share their experience with us on this.

Thanks and 73
Tom K0SN
Porterfield, WI


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com