[CQ-Contest] Packet Pileups -> Breaking Pileups
K3BU at aol.com
K3BU at aol.com
Mon Dec 4 13:04:38 EST 2000
In a message dated 12/4/2000 12:32:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
nn4t at bellsouth.net writes:
> No Yuri, it doesn't make you weird. It doesn't make you right, either.
> Packet is just another technology, like others before it, that is impacting
> amateur radio. In the case of packet, which no one has to use unless they
> wish to, its impact is positive, overall. This is because the causal
> operators, looking to boost their DXCC, WAZ, WAS or other totals use packet
> to find stations they need to work.
The only problem is when one is supposed to run the marathon (contest SO) and
gets the ride from the "friend" with pickup and claims to be running on his
own. Why not to say that we all RUN only?
Just like another technology, like bars in the ZOO or helicopter hunters
having "fun" and saving time. Go find me a deer, tie him up to the tree, tell
me where he is, I will drive in and shoot it "high tech" style.
THE WHOLE ESSENCE OF CONTESTING IS SHOWING ONE'S SKILL IN FINDING AND NAILING
THE PREY (QSO or mult.). Not herding the pile of animals on the front of you
and pulling the F1 trigger.
We went through with this on DX front about lists and nets, and we lost. They
blossom and people are proud of their "accomplishments" (killing DX in the
ZOO), so looks like we are heading in the same direction.
There are those who get it, there are those who don't, and there are those
who never will.
Aw FUGGETTABOUTIT! Enjoy whatever turns you on!
Yuri,
the lone hunter?
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list