[CQ-Contest] Re: Bad practices identified

[Scott Ellington]

Jimk8mr at aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 7/24/00 12:00:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, w7ti at jps.net
> writes:
> 
> >
> >  For contesting purposes, perhaps a single ? should be used in place of QRL?
> >  anyway.  In the context of contesting, it's meaning would be quite clear.

> This is what I have done for years.  Not only is it quicker, but it has the
> additional meaning of "Who was that who was just calling CQ, 

Exactly.  Often, that "?" results in an immediate QSO.  That's the next best
thing to finding a clear frequency.

73,

Scott  K9MA


-- 
Scott Ellington
Madison, Wisconsin   USA

sdelling at facstaff.wisc.edu


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com