[CQ-Contest] Re: [dx-list] Single op definition change. (Acting rather than speaking)

[Renegade]

Martín Monsalvo LW9EUJ wrote:

> Hi:
> I'm in favor of changing the single op definition to allow the use of
> packet, and other means of dx alert, such as on the air assist by friends,
> etc.

WHY?
1.  The big contestors stay on one frequency - no benefit.
2.  The ones that scan the bands use packet and dx alerts anyway.
3.  So - no need for change!

de Rene




--
 Renegade
 - from the Peoþles Reþûblïç of Winnetka

mailto:WB6PSY at qsl.net     <or>
mailto:tagteam at qualityservice.com
http://www.qsl.net/wb6psy/
dx club:  http://www.scdxc.org/
eFax: 413 228-7736           E-:-)
If at first you don’t succeed - Skydiving is not for you.

This email is intended only to be read or used by the addressee.
It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information.
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, or
responsible for delivery of the message to such person,
you may not read, copy or deliver this message to anyone,
and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by reply email.
Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by
reason of mistaken delivery to you.



--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com