[CQ-Contest] Assisted or Not Assisted?

[jbattin]

When you use a computer program that has in it thousands of calls  prepared
by another party ..... Is that not assisted also... I think we are trying to
legislate technology, which in the long run never works.
John  k9DX


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Timo" <timo.klimoff at kolumbus.fi  Mon Nov 13 21:21:45 2000
From: Timo" <timo.klimoff at kolumbus.fi (Timo)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:21:45 +0200
Subject: Vs: [CQ-Contest] Better now or 20 years ago ?
References: <00f801c04cd5$260b6580$82860f97 at i4jmy>
Message-ID: <001a01c04db7$de69bf40$b5dbe5c1 at tklimoff>


> In order to eliminate at least one of the "forever doubts", contesters
> should finally press organizers to adopt the same line with no distinction
> for with and without packetcluster.
> 
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY

When(/if) we can use packet all SO classes, it also changes single op contesting dramatically (at the high level): no more band tuning for new mults, SO is able to notice all the band openings by packet cluster spots - the winner will be an operator who can beat the packet pileups quicker and has the best strategy for working new spots.

I don't know if this change is good or bad but it really makes the feeling of SO operating really different (just try WAE contests ...). The names of the winners will remain the same anyhow, I think ...

73 Timo OH1NOA
http://www.qsl.net/oh1noa



--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com