[CQ-Contest] Re: Packet pile ups - do we need them?
Pete Smith
n4zr at contesting.com
Tue Nov 28 20:00:55 EST 2000
At 09:46 PM 11/26/00 -0800, Dick Frey wrote:
>
>Well put, Martin.
>
>It is frustrating on this side too. We unassisted ops are really happy when
>we stumble across a new mult - you were a double on 40M. Suddenly there is
>no order -- Big Stations calling out of sequence, off frequency, and not
>listening. It seems the tactic is to grab the spot and call repeatedly
>until the station answers.
I agree mostly. When you come on one of these pileups late, it seems as if
some frequency offset can be the key to getting through. I had this happen
several times when I was able to match offsets with the previously
successful station. So maybe when someone calls "off frequency" it just
means he's trying to crack through the mess... In fact, I think maybe I
did this with VK5GN once (hi).
73, Pete N4ZR
Contesting is ... Extreme Radio
The World Contest Station Database
is back up and running at
http://www.qsl.net/n4zr
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list