[CQ-Contest] Penalties CQWW??
CT1BOH - José Carlos cardoso Nunes
ct1boh at mail.telepac.pt
Tue Sep 5 08:14:38 EDT 2000
Yuri
I too thought most of the errors to be not my problem until I recorded the
entire contest and later checked all my UBN against the recording.
I was surprised to find how accurate the UBN is after all.
I recommend everybody to do the same. Not only is a lesson in humbleness but
you will learn how to avoid common stupid mistakes.
The UBN report cannot be 100% correct but it is a lot more accurate than
the most accurate operator you can find in the world.
73
José Carlos Nunes
CT1BOH
> Esteemed log checkers insist on "making it hard" on us to be accurate by
> having "penalties." I typically find about one-third of "problems" to be
not
> my problems, but I get three times as many points taken out for those
> "problems".
>
> I vote that this practice be eliminated and if not let us have access to
> master database so we can run our logs through it before submitting our
logs
> and avoid problematic "penalties" by having stuff flagged as it would be
by
> UBNers.
>
> Yea, I know CQ WW is the best contest, participation is increasing,
> everything is fine, don't rock it. Nothing wrong by making it even better
and
> little bit more fair esp. to large countries by eliminating 0 QSO point
rule
> (like WPX did). Am I the lonely voice (CW) in the contest wilderness?
>
> Yuri, K3BU
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list