[CQ-Contest] Post contest review, Opinions?

[ted demopoulos]

I review my logs post contest for obvious errors when and if I have time.

Last test I had a valid F6 call with "####" appended - obviously I 
accidently hit the "#" key, and a 767G4" call - again, obviously not what I 
had copied.

Beyond that, if someone has enough time to relisten to the whole contest, it 
depends on what the rules say.

My opinion?? - well, I've got better things to do, and I would hope others 
would as well,

73

Ted, KR1G


>From: "Bruce Lifter" <wt4i at brevard.net>
>To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] Post contest review, Opinions?
>Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 10:17:03 -0400
>
>
>This reflector seems to imply that any post contest log review
>is cheating. Is this true? What is the general opinion? What is
>deemed acceptable and where is it considered cheating?
>
>1. If by scanning the log I find WT4IWT4I or WT4I599. Obviously WT4I is the
>    callsign and was copied correctly. If I correct the log prior to
>submission,
>    would you consider that to be cheating?
>
>2. What if it is a NAQP style contest and I find 3 entries as follows:
>
>    14085 1800 WT4I   BRUCE  FL
>    21084 1901 WT4IW  BRUCE  FL
>     7080 2345 WT4I   BRUCE  FL
>
>    The second callsign is obviously wrong. Was it copied wrong? Was it
>    just a typo. If I correct the log prior to submission, would you
>    consider that to be cheating? If it is cheating, should I leave it
>    alone or exclude the contact from the log?
>
>73, Bruce WT4I
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From Mike Tessmer" <k9nw at qth.com  Mon Sep 11 01:51:44 2000
From: Mike Tessmer" <k9nw at qth.com (Mike Tessmer)
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:51:44 -0400
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Sprint Mults
Message-ID: <002301c01b8a$91c1ae00$779e8ad1 at default>


Why are all the Maritime provinces lumped together as one mult?
What is the rationale behind this?


Mike K9NW

(I hope I don't get penalized for being Not On Topic......)


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com