[CQ-Contest] Fwd: [FCG] riding the RF gain...
Clive Whelan
clive at gw3njw.fsworld.co.uk
Thu Dec 6 00:56:20 EST 2001
Tree N6TR wrote:
> Typically, they show 3rd order products down about 30 or
> 35 db from the two signals. With reduced RF gain, it is
> more like 50 or 55 db. This might improve the ability to
> hear a weak signal in noise, or lots of QRM.
>
Hmm don't really understand those absolute figures. Have I
understood correctly. I take this to mean the following:
Signal A on ( say) 21025
Signal B on ( say) 21028
say at equal strength
IMD products audible on 21022 and 21031 30 or 35 dB down?
If so this would be horrendous and the band would be full of
fragments of broken CW when Station A and B were key down
together but not just one or the other. This was the original
problem with the TS870S ( see Radcom and QST reviews ca. 1996),
and the IMD products were *only* 56dB down, as opposed to 90dB
or more for signals spaced >15kHz. This was said to be due to
the inherent problems of DSP filtering and poor grade roofing
filters, but I suspect was rather inadequate gain distribution,
i.e. too much RF and not enough IF. I believe this was addressed
by Kenwood sometime in 1996. However the 870 is still not
perfect and I experienced the above problem on 21Mhz in the
recent CQWW CW, finding it necessary to introduce 6dB of
attenuation, in addition to operating in the AIP mode ( minus
one of the RF amps I think).
I have *never* experienced this with the FT1000MP nor e.g the
TS930, and suspect the same would apply to the TS850. N.B. that
this does not mean that the FT1000MP is a better ( contest) rig
than the TS870S, in fact I believe the opposite to be the case,
and I have recently retired my FT1000MP/TS930 combo in favour of
a pair of TS870Ss, the reasons for which are beyond the scope of
this note. Of course everyone has their personal preferences
-caveat ymmv!-, and my only real point is that surely IMD
products only 30-35dB down can't be right?
Of course I may have misunderstood in which case I am happy to
be disabused.
73
Clive
GW3NJW
gw3njw at gw7x.org
Contest Cambria-http://www.gw7x.org
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list