[CQ-Contest] Bad Packet Spots
Cooper Stewart
CooperSG at odl.co.uk
Thu Dec 20 10:36:48 EST 2001
I noticed this too. At the time, I put it down to people spotting stuff that
they had worked. Some stations do that for their own reasons. I never
thought that there might be an ulterior motive.
Stewart
MM7I / GM4AFF
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Totten, N4GN [mailto:n4gn at n4gn.com]
Sent: 20 December 2001 04:02
To: Contest Reflector
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Bad Packet Spots
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Fred Hoffert NA2U wrote:
> But in number of cases, I grabbed spot immediately and when I got to
> the frequency there was another station running. At one time there
> were two spots for different stations and when I grabbed them I found
> the same station was running on the frequency and that station's
> callsign was not the one spotted either time.
I had no less than five cases in the 10-meter contest when I went to a
packet spot freq and rather than finding the new mult that had been
spotted, I discovered one rather well-known and experienced European
contester running on the frequency. The first time it happened, I thought
"oh well, the mult I expected doesn't seem to be here, but I might as well
work Mr. Well-Known and Experienced European Contester since I'm already
here." And so I did.
But after the second, third, fourth and fifth times this happened, I got a
bit suspicious. Isn't it interesting that this guy "just happened" to be
on a frequency where only seconds earlier a rare mult had been spotted?
Mr. Well-Known wasn't the guy who put out the packet spot, so it wasn't a
case of him spotting DX that called him. I'm sure he understands that
practice isn't generally accepted anyway. And it sure seemed odd that I
never heard any of those five spotted calls later in the contest.
I didn't keep good enough notes the first three times, so I don't have
enough evidence to feel comfortable making any accusations. But if anyone
else noticed this same thing, perhaps we can compare what notes we have.
You can bet I will start making some better notes in the future,
especially if I find this same guy under similar circumstances!
73,
Tim Totten, n4gn at n4gn.com
http://www.n4gn.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list