[CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQ WW for Busting Packet Cheaters!

[Gene Walsh]

It is far more efficient, if it can be worked out, to log both of
them.  If you can time your exchange such that each person thinks you
are talking to him (Or her), you can log them both.  Done it many
times, did it in the GAQP ydy.  Only it doesn't work for serial
numbers.

This is the "Don Miller" method.

N2AA

>From: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg at contesting.com>
>To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQ WW for Busting Packet Cheaters!
>Date: 23 Jul 2001 12:48:22 -0700
>
> > loud 'I KNOW MY $%&*@% CALL'.  But then I think that he could be doing
> > it for the reason that somebody else is operating quite close to me and
> > he is just confirming who he is actually working.
>
>I've needed to do this from time to time.  While S&Ping I'd come across two 
>stations sitting virtually on top of each other - sometimes I'd get 
>answered by both at once - it was ABSOLUTELY necessary to send the other 
>guy's call.
>
>I don't recall it being necessary on packet pileups.  They are usually too 
>broad for anyone else to be nearby - at least for long.
>
>73 Mike N2MG
>
>________________________________________________
>PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart.
>http://www.peoplepc.com
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com