[CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQ WW for Busting Packet Cheaters!

[Stewart Cooper]

It's strange how this thread all started from the snip below - which does
not state that the 'means' that were actually used to extract the
information involved checking who was logged on to the cluster at all.
Anyway, it wouldn't matter who you logged on as.
If there is a correlation between what you work and what is spotted over a
48 period, especially within 5 minutes of spotting, I think the ball would
be in your court to argue that you weren't cheating. Of course, a good cheat
would always 'deny, deny, deny'.

Try the IOTA Contest this weekend please!

Stewart GM0F/GM4AFF

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Tippett [mailto:btippett at alum.mit.edu]
Sent: 21 July 2001 15:38
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Kudos to CQ WW for Busting Packet Cheaters!



        Just got my August CQ and read the following in the section titled
"Packet":

"The CQ WW Contest Committee has developed the means of extracting
information supplied to us by sysops from around the world and applying it
to a questionable log.  By these means we found several operators in the SSB
contest who did not claim the assisted category but used packet.  Their
calls do not appear in the score listings."

        VERY BIG KUDOS AND THANK YOU to the CQ WW Committee!

                                                73,  Bill  W4ZV

--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com