[CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R
Barry
w2up at mindspring.com
Sun Jul 29 14:56:20 EDT 2001
Lee,
I'm not aware of any FCC regs prohibiting more than one signal
simultaneously. That would certainly put the M/M's out of business
quickly. Hey, there's an idea!
73 Barry
On 29 Jul 01, Leigh S. Jones wrote:
>
> Because there is some confusion on this subject, I'll answer. I don't
> know of any SO2R operator who believes that he is allowed by contest
> rules or FCC regulations to transmit two signals simultaneously, for
> example by keying both rigs with the same keyer or allowing computers
> to send different messages on two rigs at the same time. To do so has
> been disallowed by the sponsors of most contests since the early days
> of contesting.
>
> Calling CQ alternately on two different bands while listening for an
> answer on the rig that is not transmitting would be allowed but is
> generally not practiced because the mode cannot be continued for long
> enough to make it work -- finding a new frequency can be an immense
> effort and you would invariably relinquish an unused frequency more
> than once per minute if you could get a new one back fast enough.
> Instead, while sending a CQ or an exchange on one band (by computer or
> memory keyer), one tunes on the alternate band in search of new
> multipliers or contacts.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed - K0iL" <k0il at arrl.net>
> To: <w7why at harborside.com>; "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 8:11 AM
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R
>
>
> >
> > On Friday, 27 July, 2001 8:13 PM, Tom Osborne
> [SMTP:w7why at harborside.com]
> > wrote:
> > > The only negative I see is from some posts that some have heard
> > > stations calling CQ on different bands at the same time. That is
> > > definitely a no-no.
> >
> > Why is this a No-No? It IS 2 radios, not just 2 Rcvrs.
> >
> > If CQing on multi-bands is a "no-no" as you say, with some ops
> operating
> > with 2 radios leads one to ask "How would we ever know that's not
> what
> > they're doing?" It would be similar to an op who is connected to
> > packetcluster while in a contest. He could be seeing the spots;
> then
> > again, he might have "SET/NODX" and "SET/NOANNOUN" and isn't seeing
> > anything except WWV reports which he could get via e-mail as well.
> How
> > could we ever know?
> >
> > 73,
> > de ed -K0iL
> >
> >
> > --
> > CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> > Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
> >
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up at mindspring.com
Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list