[CQ-Contest] Uniques are not removed

[k8cc]

However, I know for a fact that removing uniques (simply because they are 
unique) is not allowed for ARRL RTTY logs.

Dave/K8CC


At 09:54 AM 7/29/01 -0400, Shelby Summerville wrote:

>Right you are! If a call was not in 3 or more logs, it was "removed" in
>CQ/RJ WW RTTY WPX.
>C'Ya Shelby, K4WW
>The trouble with mental notes: the ink fades so quickly!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Billy Cox <aa4nu at ix.netcom.com>
>To: Mark Beckwith <swca at swbell.net>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 1:09 AM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques are not removed
>
>
> >
> >
> > > Um, QSOs aren't removed just because they are unique.  In fact, when I
>get
> > on
> > > and make only one QSO from my "poor antenna station," I sometimes get an
> > email
> > > from a log checker asking if I made the contact - just to be safe.  The
> > log
> > > checkers ARE bending over backwards.
> >
> > SSB/CW they may not be .. but in some of the RTTY contests, uniques ARE
> > removed ... this was a recent thread on the RTTY lists ... I think the
> > ruling is
> > if the station does not show up in THREE submitted logs, it's removed.
> >
> > 73 Billy AA4NU
> >
> >
> > --
> > CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> > Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
> >
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com