[CQ-Contest] SS observations ( kinda long)

[Mark Bailey]

Hi Bob:

You'd have to change transmitters as well as callsigns and locations.
See the ARRL General contest rules:

---------------------

3.3. An operator may not use more than one call sign from any given location
during the contest period.

3.5. A transmitter used to contact one or more stations may not be
subsequently used under any other call during the contest period, except for
family stations where more than one call has been issued, and then only if
the second call sign is used by a different operator. (The intent of this
rule is to accommodate family members who must share a rig, and to prohibit
manufactured or artificial contacts.)

--------------------

There is at least one guy who travels to 5 or 6 different stations to
operate
SS...

73,

Mark, KD4D

kd4d at radix.net

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
[mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of
bob.wruble at verizon.net
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 4:58 PM
To: Mark Beckwith; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS observations ( kinda long)



if nothing else make it into 2- 15 hour events and let us use different
calls for each segment so we cud at least compete against ourselves!
actually a guy cud do that now .... one way to increase the action and
reduce the boredom etc......

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Beckwith" <swca at swbell.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:54 AM
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] SS observations ( kinda long)


>
> Chuck, KI9A, said:
>
> >change the SS rules to help cure the Sunday doldrums.
> [snip]
> >Make multiple Q's with same station.
> [snip]
> >maybe a slight tweak in the
> >rules is in order?
> [snip]
> >Let the flames begin!
>
> I don't think this change would be a "slight tweak."  Changing SS like
this
> would be a major change and I don't agree that it is warranted.  2
reasons:
>
> 1. I think making major changes in contest rules is usually a bad idea.
>
> 2. SS is fine the way it is as far as I am concerned.
>
> Mark, N5OT
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com