[CQ-Contest] SS Question

[Jim Reisert]

At 11:18 AM 11/14/2001 -0500, Bill Coleman wrote:
>On 11/7/01 3:39 PM, Mark Bailey at kd4d at radix.net wrote:
>
> >Y'all need to consult the rules:
>
>Actually, the contest judges are a bit smarter than the rules. The log
>checking software recognises when your exchange is "unstable" in this
>manner.
>
>So long as your log reflects what you actually sent, everything is fine.

I don't buy this argument.  The rules are the rules.  They say to do it a 
certain way.  The log checkers ONLY have the rules to apply to the 
logs.  If they apply a different standard, so be it.  But if that standard 
is not documented IN THE RULES, then it may not work tomorrow, so you can't 
rely on it.

73 - Jim AD1C


-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com