[CQ-Contest] ARRL CW - No Packet

Mike Gilmer - N2MG n2mg at contesting.com
Fri Nov 30 06:37:22 EST 2001

Don't forget the thrill of finding a new one on your own, that most of the DX you DO find will NOT be under bottomless pileups of lids that cannot even hear the DX, and the fact that you will likely NOT be working a busted call.

Mike N2MG

On Thu, 29 November 2001, "Rick Tavan" wrote:

> What?! Reintroduce the skill requirement of searching a band for mults? Give the advantage back to stations that have two positions per band? Heresy! Sacrilege! Moiduh da bumms!
> (Cool idea, Bill.)
> /Rick N6XI
> Bill Fisher W4AN wrote:
> > I've already got my sites set on ARRL CW.  A few of us bound for OH in
> > July are considering competing in the M/S category and not using
> > packet.  K1DG ran the idea by me this week and the thought of doing a
> > multi-op without packet got me all excited about the contest!
> >
> > So, I'm wondering if it would not be fun for all of the top multi-op
> > stations to turn off the cluster for just one weekend?  After its over,
> > lets see if you don't all have more fun.  I know I will.

PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 

CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list