[CQ-Contest] Re: K3NM/LU9AY 40M SSB FCC Fiasco

[Barry N1EU]

Just a quick additional comment:  I think the least that the ARRL owes those 
named in such reports, is the opportunity to provide a short (paragraph) 
rebuttal that would be published alongside.  Due process would then be 
served to some degree, and the league membership would be served.

73,
Barry  N1EU



>From: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg at contesting.com>

>As much as I find the situation distateful (regardless
>of the facts surrounding the interference event) it is
>not uncommon for "news" to get headlines in the US,
>only to have retractions published days, weeks, months
>later on some back page.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com