[CQ-Contest] 160m band plan and CQWW SSB contest
Tom Rauch
W8JI at contesting.com
Mon Oct 15 21:17:41 EDT 2001
> I would like to propose that those who will be transmitting below
> 1840 operate split frequency and listen higher in the band for USA
> stations so our contesting friends in the US don't have to take this
> risk. This is what we plan on doing from PJ2Z......
>
> Jeff KU8E
I often hear dozens of Europeans in any SSB contest on 160 below
1850, and without fail they are under strong USA stations parked
on one frequency and working only domestic contacts.
I'm sure most don't realize that makes working DX simplex on 160
during contests impossible. It is just silly to work simplex there,
especially with so many wide signals and people who won't let
someone else who hears the DX have a shot at it.
If the DX stations would listen up the band (USA can transmit
anywhere from 1843 up to 2000), and the USA stations would stay
above 1843, everyone would be much better off.
During the California QSO party there was one lone W6 calling CQ
after CQ on 1815 SSB, even bothering a few QRP CW stations out
east. The whole band was mostly empty above 1845.
73, Tom W8JI
W8JI at contesting.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list