[CQ-Contest] Nonstop 48 hours for SO on CQWW
Mike Gilmer - N2MG
n2mg at contesting.com
Sun Sep 9 13:49:45 EDT 2001
Not sure what contest's results are being looking at.
For example, ARRL and CQ do not publish hours operated
in their big DX contests. ARRL did as of 1999,
http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/99/intldxcw.pdf
(page 4)
but no longer. In 1999 there were apparently a great
number of logs (mine included) where the operator
failed to indicate the operating time (it doesn't
matter for the results) and the ARRL had no choice but
to publish "48" as the time. My guess is that problem
is one reason why they gave it up listing the time.
73 Mike N2MG
On Fri, 07 September 2001, "Zoltan Szoke" wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I often see "Operating Time (hrs): 48" at Single Operator stations. This is
> unbelievable for me. Nonstop 48 hours QSOing, nonstop 2 days contesting too
> long for an SO station. I think so (at least in 50%) that is not true. Or I
> don't know something what easy for a really good, strong and avid contester.
> Do you know offer me any practices what help me to endure to the end of the
> contest without any sleeping?
>
> All responses will be appreciate. Thanks!
>
>
> 73
> Zoli
> HA5PP
________________________________________________
PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart.
http://www.peoplepc.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list