[CQ-Contest] WRTC glitches

Mike Gilmer, N2MG n2mg at eham.net
Tue Jul 16 18:46:31 EDT 2002


I don't think I'd want to be the one to tell a WRTC competitor who has 
used CT for 10 years that he has to learn TRLog or SuperDuper or 
whatever.  I believe it's pretty much the same reasoning behind letting 
the ops choose their own radios.

But I agree that the software should have been tested...alas.  It'll be 
interesting to see just what the bug was.

-Mike N2MG

The following message was sent by "David L. Thompson" <thompson at mindspring.com> on Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:40:50 -0400.

> It seems that with all the effort to provide similar transceiver, location,
> and antennas that the same software would be used.   And the software should
> be tested beforehand.
> 
> I always run several different logs through my CQ 160 software each year to
> assure its checking OK and get rid of bugs.   Writelog authors and
> supporters including K9JY say that for each contest you should always set up
> a test log and give it a spin before the contest.  With N6AA, K5ZD and other
> logging experts on hand this should have been fundamental.
> 
> I am also concerned that the address for e-mail logs filled up and kicked
> back some logs.
> 
> Otherwise congratulations to the contestants and sponsors.
> 
> 73 Dave K4JRB




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list