[CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?

Bob Naumann - N5NJ n5nj at gte.net
Wed Nov 27 12:22:08 EST 2002


Brett,

I think that either your feeble old memory or mine has mixed up the capabilities of other keyers with the accu memory.

There was an Accu-Memory II that was only available in a commercial version that may have had features such as this, but I don't believe that the original was that sophisticated.

I thought that such pauses for input were started in keyers such as the venerable KC Keyer and some from AEA.

73,
N5NJ

> 
> From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg at harts.org.hk>
> Date: 2002/11/27 Wed AM 09:46:13 EST
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW - are signal reports optional?
> 
> N5NJ asked:
> 
> >Maybe WB4VVF is to blame?  (Any other OT's remember that callsign?)
> 
> Okay, that's it - I _am_ an OT... not only do I remember 'VVF, but I also have
> an Accu-Keyer & an Accu-Memory somewhere in the basement of my Dad's
> house back in W7.
> 
> If my recollection is correct, one could program a pause in a message of
> the Accu-Memory, so inserting a non-599 report was entirely possible,
> although it would force one to manually insert the RST every time.
> 
> 73, VR2BrettGeezer
> (with apologies to N5OT)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list