[CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again

Mike Clarson mclarson at rcc.com
Thu Dec 2 01:11:39 EST 2004


Hey--no jabs at construction articles--they are 'webbing' those too--look at
that 1296 amp in the latest issue--all the construction details are on the
web, the article is just a fluff piece. --Mike, WV2ZOW

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Tom Osborne
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:54 PM
To: CQ Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again


W2RU wrote (among other things):

>Quite frankly, if space is *truly* an issue, and it has to be one or
the >other, I'd rather have the line scores than text that duplicates
the >tabular Top 10 listings.

_________________________________________________

Or another article about how to build a 2000 Ghz transverter!

Tom W7WHY

__



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list