[CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting
Russell Hill
rustyhill at earthlink.net
Thu Dec 2 11:43:07 EST 2004
Good Morning, Luc-- this is from Rusty, na5tr, who started the thread about
antenna height.
Fundamentally, I agree with you. With my antenna height, I would not be in
the category I have suggested.
We have a problem here in the U.S. More and more people are forced by
economics and availability of housing to live in areas where antennas are
very limited, even though in many cases the houses are quite expensive, nice
houses. Basically, almost all new houses for the past 30 or so years have
been built in subdivisions with deed restrictions which severely limit
antenna height, or these days prohibit external antennas entirely. There
are fewer and fewer amateurs who are able to own a house where they can
legally put up a decent antenna, while more and more amateurs are legally
prevented from putting up good antennas. At the same time more and more
communities are passing laws which limit antennas. (This is legal here in
the U.S.)
If an amateur wishes to put up a large or even decent sized antenna, he
needs buy a piece of land out in the county, not in a subdivision, and
build a house, or live in an older part of a city where there are no deed
restrictions because the houses were all built before deed restrictions
became popular. If he wishes to buy a house less than 30 years old, and
live in a neighbrhood near schools and stores, then he will only be able to
buy a house with deed restrictions preventing good antennas.
I have a place in the country with a nice house. I have a 72 ft crankup
with a 20 ft mast on top. (That is not a big tower, but it suits my needs.)
I have the option of putting up a bigger tower, and more antennas. Most
amateurs do not.
I am concerned that the number of serious contesters will decline. The
statistics say the average age of amateurs in the U.S. is getting older.
The percentage of U.S. citizens who are active amateurs is declining. I
believe that having a category for amateurs who cannot have good antennas
will perhaps keep some in the hobby who would otherwise walk away. I would
hate to see contesting die out due to lack of participation.
QRP, LP and HP categories are all well and good, but if the only thing a guy
can put up is an "invisible" dipole at 30 ft, no matter how good an operator
he is, he is simply at a big handicap.
Thanks for reading this, Luc. I have tried to give you some insight as to
the thinking behind the idea of a limited height category.
73,
Rusty
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luc, PY8AZT" <py8azt at amazon.com.br>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Cc: <daven2nl at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Physical conditioning and contesting
Hi Dave et al,
First, congrats about take care about your health. Over weight is the most
cause of death in world. I did this same way early 2003. Now, I eliminated
23kg (~50 pounds), just by changing my lifestyle, eating and working out
about 4 hours/week.
Before, be awake was my strongest obstacle during contest. On the 2003 CQWW
CW, it was first time I ran full 48hs, ending up over 2k5 QSOs SOAB LP (I
have modest station: 3 elements triband, wires for low bands and 100W Rig).
After contest, I keep excited and cannot sleep. So, I went to computer to
write up an article about CQWW. I moved to the bad after 65 hours since
friday morning.
The benefits of weight loss are beyond health and for sure give advantages
on
48h contests, like CQWW. So, some body could sugest split fat and slim Op's
category...hi hi hi
Finals, who want be competitive needs to invest in whatever (i.e. antennas,
radios, skills, SO2R, even health - respecting ALL and SAME rules) to take
advantages over crowd - not asking for new category or changing rules. In
MHO, sound ridiculous change rules to benefit who didn't move on toward to
be
competitive. Who want win needs to outstand the crowd by working hard to
master code, know HF propagation, handle pileup, be awake, antennas, SO2R,
and strategy!
By the way, thanks for all QSOs on the CQWW CW. I was ZZ8Z (SOSB20m LP),
ended up with 1400 Qs, 117 Cty, 35 Zn and 650k pts after 35h operating time.
Best 73,
Luc, PY8AZT
>Beginning this past July, I made lifestyle changes in the way I
>ate and exercized. I never considered myself obese, since I always
>made the Coast
>Guard's weight requirements, but I was carrying quite a few extra pounds.
>I
>often had knee, ankle, and lower back problems, the latter causing
>difficulties during contests after being seated for long stretches.
> Since then, I've taken bicycling back up, and so far have lost more
>than
>40 pounds. When I'm not at sea, I've been averaging between 130 and 150
>miles a week on the bike. I've noticed a massive improvement in the way I
>feel. During this past weekend's CQWW CW contest, I felt absolutely no
>discomfort after relatively long operating stretches. This suprised me,
>considering I was using a 5 gallon pail as a chair! In addition, I felt
>much
>less fatigue at the end of the weekend, even though I'd slept only 3 hours
>since Friday AM.
> This was the first contest I've participated in since I began
>exercising.
>Some may say contesting is not a physically demanding sport, but I beg to
>differ. I felt dramatically better this time around, and it's great to
>see
>yet another benefit of my increased activity level. This is certainly
>another advantage I can utilize during competition.
> While we're looking for any advantage to improve our score - new
>antennas,
>SO2R, ETC - most people seem to ignore the most important thing, the
>operator. When you look around at the next club meeting, you can tell
>there's lots of impovement possible when it comes to physical conditioning.
> My decision to make these changes was inspired in part by Bill, W4AN.
>
>Bill was an avid cyclist and someone I looked up to as a contester. It
>really sucks not being able to share my story with him, nor ever have the
>opportunity to ride with him.
>
>73, Dave N2NL/MM
>Main Propulsion Chief, USCGC Thetis
>Currently deployed at sea
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Member: LABRE / ARRL / CWJF / Uirapuru DX Club
Home Phone: +55 (91) 276-5383
Cell Phone: +55 (91) 8131-1010
Club Home Page: http://www.uirapuru.org
DX Brasil Page: http://www.uirapuru.org/dxbrasil
Entrar na Lista de Discussão CQ Contest:
cq_contest-subscribe at topica.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list