[CQ-Contest] Operator Error

Dennis Younker SunGodX at cox.net
Wed Nov 10 23:35:50 EST 2004


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr at arrl.net>
To: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz at gte.net>
Cc: "Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator Error


> 
> On Nov 10, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
> 
>> With regard to the inconsistent sending of precedence, checks and 
>> sections,
>> my understanding is that the log checking software is smart enough to 
>> flag
>> such stations' exchange as "unstable." Receiving stations are not 
>> penalized
>> in that situation.
>>
>> With regard to how "unstable" numbers are treated, N6TR, who developed 
>> the
>> log checking software, would need to address the issue. I would suggest
>> sending in your log with a notation that errors were made in the 
>> numbers
>> that were sent.
> 
> Since the cabrillo format fully specifies the exchanges that were sent 
> and received, so long as they are correct, it shouldn't be a problem, 
> right? I mean, if the exchange sent actually matches what was sent, 
> then shouldn't the log checking software be able to check against it?
> 
> 
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net

That's just it.  He sent something other than he logged.

--Dennis


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list