[CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick

[John Geiger]

And in addition, everyone at the WRTC was using
similarily equipped stations at a geographically
similar location.  When we get that level of a playing
field in regular contests, maybe we can start to add
additional rules.

73s John NE0P

--- K0HB  <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> --
>   http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
> 
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Ken Widelitz <widelitz at gte.net>
> 
> > True, the WRTC rule was there was no listening or
> transmitting prior to
> the
> > contest. No other contest of which I am aware
> currently has that rule.
> 
> I don't think the WRTC shoot-outs can be used as a
> "Gold Standard" against
> which to compare other contest rules.  
> 
> When every other contest includes an impartial
> on-site referee at each
> station, then we can start writing rules like "no
> populating your band map
> with recent signals heard".
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
>   "Everything not specifically prohibited is
> mandatory."
>                                                   
> -W0VDI(sk)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com