[CQ-Contest] CQ 2005 Contest Survey

jukka.klemola@nokia.com jukka.klemola at nokia.com
Fri Aug 26 02:14:58 EDT 2005

Yes, the logging mis-accuracy should be changed in value.
I would like to increase the penalty instead of removing it.
5 QSO penalty would be better for a BAD QSO and 6 QSO penalty for
not-in-log as the logging accuracy is a major item to measure.

The North Americans get more points per QSO to their own continent than
us in EU.
That should be fixed.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] 
>Sent: 26 August, 2005 03:35
>To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 2005 Contest Survey
>In a message dated 8/25/2005 8:21:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
>km9m-zig at comcast.net writes:
>There is a question regarding awards, and an area to add 
>comments at the bottom of the page. This is a great 
>opportunity to voice your concerns directly to CQ.<<
>And ask for removing 3 QSO "penalty", get 1 point for domestic 
>QSOs, process results faster, ?....
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list