[CQ-Contest] CQ 2005 Contest Survey
it9blb at infcom.it
Fri Aug 26 08:43:27 EDT 2005
jukka.klemola at nokia.com wrote:
> Yes, the logging mis-accuracy should be changed in value.
> I would like to increase the penalty instead of removing it.
> 5 QSO penalty would be better for a BAD QSO and 6 QSO penalty for
> not-in-log as the logging accuracy is a major item to measure.
> Jukka OH6LI/OH0V/OH4A
I agree: I've seen a lot of operators (me too!) hardly upgrading their
operating skill after seen the negative "weight" of their logged bad Qs.
Too many people, mostly new contesters, still consider the mis-accuracy
"Formula 1" style more important than a little bit slower but cleaner way to
run piles. Just give a look to some declared 3830's scores and than to the
final numbers .... someone looses a lot of places just for mis-accuracy:
it's extemely right to me.
Just my personal opinion,
More information about the CQ-Contest