[CQ-Contest] CQ 2005 Contest Survey

[Craig Cook]

Fill it out. Click SUBMIT. Nothing happens. It acts like it is trying to 
load something, but never does. Just freezes there, no confirmation that you 
SUBMITted. Wait 30 minutes. No change. Instructions say to only click SUBMIT 
once. Real nice. 
On 8/26/05, it9blb at infcom.it <it9blb at infcom.it> wrote: 
> 
> jukka.klemola at nokia.com wrote:
> 
> > Yes, the logging mis-accuracy should be changed in value.
> > I would like to increase the penalty instead of removing it.
> > 5 QSO penalty would be better for a BAD QSO and 6 QSO penalty for
> > not-in-log as the logging accuracy is a major item to measure.
> ......... snip
> > 73,
> > Jukka OH6LI/OH0V/OH4A
> >
> 
> I agree: I've seen a lot of operators (me too!) hardly upgrading their
> operating skill after seen the negative "weight" of their logged bad Qs.
> Too many people, mostly new contesters, still consider the mis-accuracy
> "Formula 1" style more important than a little bit slower but cleaner way 
> to
> run piles. Just give a look to some declared 3830's scores and than to the
> final numbers .... someone looses a lot of places just for mis-accuracy:
> it's extemely right to me.
> 
> Just my personal opinion,
> 
> Joe, IT9BLB/KF6FBC/9H3DC/IU9S/IH9P
> 
> http://www.ih9p.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 



-- 
Craig - N7OR