[CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria - Was WRTC 2006 - Where are all the people?

Chris Hurlbut c_hurlbut at adelphia.net
Sun Dec 18 07:30:19 EST 2005

Sure, absolutely.

But just because one guy can sit in a chair for 24 or 48 hours, doesn't
mean he is a better op than the other guy who consistently wins a CW

Not that I think it should be worth more points than an ARRL or
something... but endurance has nothing to do with being a good op.

-Chris KL9A

On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 22:26 -0800, Ken Widelitz wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> I think most people would agree that it requires MUCH less endurance to sit
> in the chair for four hours than it does for even only twenty-four hours.
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
Chris Hurlbut <c_hurlbut at adelphia.net>

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list