[CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?

Bill Coleman aa4lr at arrl.net
Thu Dec 22 12:57:19 EST 2005

On Dec 19, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Dale Martin wrote:

> Why is there a 160m band category (?) in SS CW/SSB?
> In looking over the 3830 band summary for 2005 SS CW, out of 423  
> submitted
> reports, there's only one station reporting making as many as 1 QSO  
> on 160.
> Why even bother to carry this band as a usable band in SS?

There's a few people who work several Qs on this band.

W4AN used to say, "if you are working 160m in SS, you are losing."

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list