[CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question

[Dale Putnam]

It was the requirement to /qrp that had me deciding not to enter this year,
Now with the conditions, its just as well, I suppose. There is always next 
year.
I wouldn't mind a /q occasionally, but for every contact and required only 
of the
Q stations?
  C U in the next 'test,
--...  ...--
Dale - WC7S qrp in WY


>From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg at harts.org.hk>
>To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question
>Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:29:48 +0000
>
>UA9CDC replied to DJ1YFK:
>
> >Fabian, I have told sponsors of the CQ-M  about this mistake and they
> >are committed to rectify the problem and delete this compulsory /QRP
> >staff next year. Let us hope that they will be prudent enough not to
> >upgrade you into LP from QRP.
>
>The flip side of that is hopefully those who don't log the /QRP don't
>loose the Q in log checking.
>
>73, VR2BrettGraham
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest