[CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
k7qq at netzero.net
Fri Nov 4 23:58:03 EST 2005
I've never heard of this LMR400 stuff, If a stub is being made for HF RG
213 is more than adiquate.
After all it is a Stub to absorbe harmonics, even lossy old RG 11 should
work, Just use ur handy dandy 259b to tune it.
----- Original Message -----
From: <mwdink at eskimo.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 20:48
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
> RG213 or LMR400?
> I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> Station Interference book would seem to indicate otherwise.
> RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had experience
> with stubs made of LMR400?
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/161 - Release Date: 11/3/2005
More information about the CQ-Contest