[CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?

[k7qq]

Dink
I've never heard of  this LMR400 stuff,  If a stub is being made for HF   RG
213   is more than adiquate.

After all it is a Stub to absorbe  harmonics,  even lossy old  RG 11 should
work,  Just use ur handy dandy 259b to tune it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <mwdink at eskimo.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 20:48
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?


> RG213 or LMR400?
>
> I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> Station Interference book would seem to indicate otherwise.
>
> RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had experience
> with stubs made of LMR400?
>
> 73
> dink
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/161 - Release Date: 11/3/2005
>
>