[CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
w2up at mindspring.com
Sat Nov 5 08:08:45 EST 2005
The advantge of LMR400 is it has a 100% foil wrapping the dielectric,
so it should minimize leakage in the shack. I use it for most of my
cabling in the shack. It's a lot cheaper than the double shielded
On 5 Nov 2005 k7qq wrote:
> I've never heard of this LMR400 stuff, If a stub is being made for
> HF RG 213 is more than adiquate.
> After all it is a Stub to absorbe harmonics, even lossy old RG 11
> should work, Just use ur handy dandy 259b to tune it. ----- Original
> Message ----- From: <mwdink at eskimo.com> To:
> <cq-contest at contesting.com> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 20:48
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
> > RG213 or LMR400?
> > I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> > Station Interference book would seem to indicate otherwise.
> > RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had experience
> > with stubs made of LMR400?
> > 73
> > dink
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/161 - Release Date:
> > 11/3/2005
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up at mindspring.com
Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
More information about the CQ-Contest