[CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?

[Radiosporting Fan]

QQ,
It's an issue of Q. :)

A stub made from 1-5/8 heliax will have a higher Q and
power handling than one made of RG-58/u.

Ev, W2EV


--- k7qq <k7qq at netzero.net> wrote:

> Dink
> I've never heard of  this LMR400 stuff,  If a stub
> is being made for HF   RG
> 213   is more than adiquate.
> 
> After all it is a Stub to absorbe  harmonics,  even
> lossy old  RG 11 should
> work,  Just use ur handy dandy 259b to tune it.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <mwdink at eskimo.com>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 20:48
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?
> 
> 
> > RG213 or LMR400?
> >
> > I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's
> > Station Interference book would seem to indicate
> otherwise.
> >
> > RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had
> experience
> > with stubs made of LMR400?
> >
> > 73
> > dink
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/161 -
> Release Date: 11/3/2005
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs