[CQ-Contest] Packet has ruined Ham Radio

[Richard Zalewski]

Yeah, the transistor and transceivers have made it all too easy.  I
think we should all return to straight keys, spark gaps, and paper
logs.  When there is a new one on you should send a letter with a 3
cent stamp to him so he gets the information.


On 12/22/06, Art Boyars <art.boyars at verizon.net> wrote:
> Plenty has been said about Packet's having taken away the challenge (and thereby discounted the skills) of finding new ones, whether it's new mul'ts or new QSOs in a Test, or just new "entities" for DXing.  Here are a couple of other observations.
>
> 1.  Back in the old days, when a "new" one showed up the alert op's would get him first.  The pile-up would build slowly.  After a few minutes (10 or 15), the pile up would be roaring.  If the DX were not a sharp op, or if he did not feel like working the pile-up, he would QRT!  Only the quick got him.  With Packet, the pile-up is aroar after the first spot.  I predicted this about 25 years ago, probably regarding spotting nets, maybe in a note to NCJ.  (I think that nowadays there are not so many casual DX stations who would attract such pile-ups.  There are certainly more Expeditions and Contest Stations that are able to handle the pile-ups.)
>
> 2.  I'm not sure, but it seems to me that the DX stations are not IDing as frequently as they did before Packet.  They know that most of the callers already have their call sign.
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> No Packet or SCP at home, but sure do use it at Multi-Multi
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


-- 
Tnx es 73
Dick W7ZR
www.w7zr.com