[CQ-Contest] Uniques

[Kelly Taylor]

Has something changed?

AFAIK, uniques do NOT get removed. They are merely pointed out as they
SUGGEST a busted or NIL QSO.

Bad and NIL QSOs do get removed, but I believe uniques are left in, as there
is no hard proof the call was wrong.

73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF at dellroy.com>
To: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj at wanadoo.fr>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj at wanadoo.fr>
>
> > I worked 23 stations in the IARU contest as M0FCR, all on CW. I worked
> > only
> > PT5M, none of the other participants.
> > Nice to know that I am a unique that gets trashed and PT5M wasted  their
> > time working me.
>
> They didn't, Al. You can find the PT5M UBN report here:
>
> http://www.wrtc2006.com/release58.html
>
> You are not in it. At least one of the 23 non-WRTC stations you worked
> must have sent in a log to the WRTC log checkers, so you didn't count as
> a unique. Your QSO counted and helped PT5M.  This is an example of
> why it was important for non-WRTC stations to email their logs in to the
> WRTC log checkers right after the contest.
>
> > Sounds like people  wanted to pollute this contest with effluent and did
a
> > great job.
> > Instead of amateur radio hosting a great event, a lot of people went out
> > of
> > their way to sabotage it.
>
> Probably just a couple of S%itheads. What's that expression "there's one
in
> every crowd".
>
> > A real shame to all those great people who spent a lot of time, energy
and
> > skill to make this event happen.
> > 73, Albert
>
> Yes, from what I can see the PY folks did a terrific job.
>
> 73, Mike W4EF...........................................
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest