[CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rulesfor HQstnsin IARUcontest

Vladimir V. Sidorov vs_otw at rogers.com
Mon Jul 17 15:33:26 EDT 2006


Hi Mark,

All correct, it would fundamentally change the game.

Let's narrow the circle. No problem if a casual operator comes and makes a
couple of contacts. Fine, if he even sends a log, he can compete to people
in the same class. We are not talking about his score, but about about HQs
scores. So let's narrow down my idea:

Only QSOs with participants conducted at least 100 (or so) contacts in the
contest are eligible for the contest score OF A HQ STATION.

Then organizers of campaigns to support the HQ teams will have to change
their attitude. They will have to ask their people not only call their own
HQ to give it a few QSO points. They will ask the supporters also to work
somebody else, because otherwise their belowed HQ station won't be granted
the desired QSO points...

Is it that bad?

73,

Vladimir VE3IAE

P.S. I hope, log checkers won't kill me right away for ideas like that...


---




> Hi Vladimir:
>
> I believe this may not be a good idea.  Many times during a contest I
> have a casual station call in who is not in the contest.  I take the
> time to explain the exchange, thank the operator, and encourage him
> to work other stations.
>
> If these guys won't add to my score, it reduces my incentive to be
> friendly to them.  I do not believe that we want to do ANYTHING
> that might discourage newcomers and casual operators from getting
> on and making a few contest QSO's.
>
> Also, contests are often won or lost depending on how many casual
> operators we work. Otherwise, the serious guys would get on, work
> each other, and then the contest would be over.  :-)
>
> This would fundamentally change the game...
>
> 73,
>
> Mark, KD4D
>
> Vladimir V. Sidorov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just another solution.
> >
> > Only QSOs with participants conducted at least 100 (or so) contacts in
the
> > contest are eligible for the contest score.
> >
> > As simple as that.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Vladimir VE3IAE
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list