[CQ-Contest] Amateur predators

[Russell Hill]

Mark, I'm glad nothing illegal occured, and it is now no Big Deal.

Rusty


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot at n5ot.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Amateur predators


> Thanks Rusty :) Let me clarify that between the ages of 13 and 18 I was 
> hit
> on by two presumably gay or pedophilic (or both) adult men who were 
> licensed
> radio amateurs.  Neither of them accomplished any illegal activity with me
> and I assume they move freely today.
>
> How's that for talking the long way around :)
>
> It was not a Big Deal.
>
> Mark, N5OT
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill at earthlink.net>
> To: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot at n5ot.com>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Amateur predators
>
>
>> Mark, I do not know the circumstances, so I cannot comment.
>>
>> In my high school ham radio club, there were a couple of hams who were
>> regularly dating a girl in the club, and later told me they considered 
>> her
>> the best kept secret in high school.
>>
>> The three of them were also members of the chess club, if I remember
>> correctly.
>>
>> So were they 2 hams hitting on another ham, or 2 chess club members
>> hitting on another chess player?  Or just 2 guys in high school behaving
>> as their sexual proclivities led them to behave?
>>
>> I think the comments about the relative safety of the ham radio community
>> vs the Internet, chat rooms, etc, is probably right on the mark.
>>
>> 73, and I have enjoyed your commentary on the reflecter on many 
>> occasions.
>> Many thanks for them all.
>>
>> Rusty, na5tr
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest