[CQ-Contest] WRTC Spot/Log Correlation
Keith Kerr
k.kerr at abdn.ac.uk
Tue Sep 5 09:11:04 EDT 2006
At 08:14 05/09/2006 +0300, Kostas SV1DPI wrote:
>FB Kurt
> I think that most of the stations use clusters today. Cluster's use
>would be permitted and not been a different category, in my opinion. These
>rules allow cheating, because the most people are not serious contesters and
>want to look for a rare dx or a missed band during the contest, so they use
>the clusters and when they send their log forget it or they don't know it.
> ......DEL.......
> In my opinion the absolute solution would be no categories, free use of
>clusters.
>
>Kostas sv1dpi
NO THANK YOU
Not again! I know this is repeating the same old story but I cannot let
this pass.
Yes, people are abusing the cluster
Yes, people are DQed when caught
Yes, I agree that the publicity should be more obvious
But
This is no reason to scrap the SO category. As someone pointed out
recently, SO Assisted is an oxymoron.
Keith GM4YXI
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
------------
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list