[CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet

Tonno Vahk tonno.vahk at mail.ee
Tue Feb 20 04:24:59 EST 2007

Accusations are most probably unfounded as OE4A must have been Multi Op I am 
sure. After years of blatant cheating SO results from him would have zero 
credibility anyway so does not make much sense to participate in this class.

The question of whether getting help from cluster to copy the call is 
ethical is left open of course but in reality it is also very difficult 
mentally not to use this info once you see it already...


p.s. the only ES5 active in ARRL DX was ES5RR from my station, no ES5E call 
assigned yet:)))

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <k4zw at comcast.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:01 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet

> Results of the 2005 CQ WW DX SSB Contest
> Disqualified: 9A4X - illegal operation in T9;
> OE4A (OE1EMS) - illegal use of packet
> spotting in the single operator category
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "I guess your "Hmmmmm" might very well be justified."
> you sure about that jim?!
> 73 de OE1EMS (OE4A in ARRL 2007 CW)
> Braco
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm at telia.com>
> Cc: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet
>> As far as I remember OE4A got hit with packet cheating in
>> the CQWW a couple years ago.
>> I guess your "Hmmmmm" might very well be justified.
>> 73 Jim SM2EKM


> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list