[CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
David Robbins K1TTT
k1ttt at arrl.net
Sun Feb 25 06:41:32 EST 2007
My thought is that the 'dx window' is a mostly out dated artifact from when
many countries had very narrow slivers and only low power on 160m.
And has been noted many times. Band plans are not law, they are made up for
normal operating conditions and are not meant to handle the large influx of
activity during contests.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of k8vf_mark at centurytel.net
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 02:47
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843
>
> Is it common for fellows to be on SSB below 1843?
> I havent noticed it in a while.
>
> Sure is tough on the 1830-35 DX window.
>
> What is the thought on this? I dont see why SSB is necessary below 1843,
> which is the normal band plan.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> K8VF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list