[CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as Part of Maryland.

[Eric Rosenberg]

Ken, 

I stand corrected on the District of Columbia counting towards WAS. 

I don't believe it is relevant to this discussion, however, as WAS is a completely separate activity that comes out of a different office.

73, 
Eric W3DQ
Washington, DC 
"taxation, but no multiplier representation"

---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:11:55 -0700
>From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker at kenharker.com>  
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as Part of >Maryland.  
>To: w3dq at arrl.net
>Cc: John Geiger <n5ten at yahoo.com>, cq-contest at contesting.com
>
>Eric,
>
>     The District of Columbia _does_ count as Marlyand for Worked All >States.
>Just as the NAQP rules have an explicit statement about the District of 
>Columbia ("District of Columbia counts as Maryland"), so too do the >rules for Worked All States ("The District of Columbia may be counted >for Maryland.")
>
>http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php?page=2
>http://www.arrl.org/awards/was/
>