[CQ-Contest] More CQWW SSB spot analysis

Steve London n2icarrl at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 09:39:43 EST 2007


Ranko,

For amateurs in the USA, you are 100% incorrect. The USA regulatory agency, the 
FCC, has made it clear that all emissions must reside within the specified 
frequency allocations.

FCC 97.307(b):
Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment 
available to the control operator. Emissions outside the necessary bandwidth 
must not cause splatter or keyclick interference to operations on adjacent 
frequencies.

By operating above 14348 or 21448 while soliciting responses from the USA, you 
are encouraging USA amateurs to violate their government regulations.

73,
Steve, N2IC


4O3A wrote:
> Dear Steve,
> 
> You are not right. In band plan definition of frequency allude carrier frequency. Width or structure of signal is nothing what users have to know about. For example, TV signal width is 8MHz, and exact frequency of TV signal is defined with carrier frequency. 
> 
> As structure of SSB is as it is, transmitting "out of band" happened following your philosophy when someone transmit USB on upper edge of band or LSB on lower edge of band. But users are responsible to take care about caries frequency, and only CARRIER frequency is parameter defined in national band plans.
> 
> You have to know that USB mode is SSB side band defined also for users allowed to use frequencies above 14350 and USB shift will go on the same side of band. Everything is in perfect order then.
> 
> 73
> Ranko - 4O3A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list