[CQ-Contest] More CQWW SSB spot analysis

[Paul Cassel]

Unlike the rest of the world, American operators are governed by what is
known as Part 97.   To this point I would suggest that excess paranoia
exists however the wording, which reads in part: "Emissions resulting from
modulation must be confined to the band or segment available to the control
operator."

Paul VE3SY

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of 4O3A
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 4:36 AM
> To: Bulletin Cq Contest (E-mail)
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW SSB spot analysis
> 
> Dear Steve,
> 
> You are not right. In band plan definition of frequency allude carrier
> frequency. Width or structure of signal is nothing what users have to know
> about. For example, TV signal width is 8MHz, and exact frequency of TV
> signal is defined with carrier frequency.
> 
> As structure of SSB is as it is, transmitting "out of band" happened
> following your philosophy when someone transmit USB on upper edge of band
> or LSB on lower edge of band. But users are responsible to take care about
> caries frequency, and only CARRIER frequency is parameter defined in
> national band plans.
> 
> You have to know that USB mode is SSB side band defined also for users
> allowed to use frequencies above 14350 and USB shift will go on the same
> side of band. Everything is in perfect order then.
> 
> 73
> Ranko - 4O3A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest