[CQ-Contest] Does anyone prefer virtual contests to real ones?

Bill Feidt bill at ng3k.com
Tue Aug 12 07:51:00 EDT 2008


Barry wrote:

> When I started the [WAEDC], I thought to myself, "I can't believe this 
> is really 36 WPM, the rate's so slow (only about 140/hr), this is 
> boring."  Then I realized, since ARRL CW, I've been playing around with 
> Morserunner once or twice a week - set the pileup as many deep as you 
> want, set the speed anywhere you want, and away you go with an instant 
> 300/hr pileup.

Given my less than modest antenna situation I can only dream of rates 
anywhere near this from my home station, but I too have been playing 
with Morse Runner a lot recently.  I have to agree with Barry, it's a 
terrific pile-up trainer.  I've only run the activity level as high as 
4 and the speed at 35 wpm so far, but I'm copying just about 100% at 
that level, so perhaps it's time to crank it up a notch or two.

A new ham I'm Elmering into the CW contesting world is also using it 
to very good advantage.  It makes for excellent, real-world code practice.

Kudos to Alex, VE3NEA, for creating and distributing such a valuable 
piece of software.

73,

Bill/NG3K


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list