[CQ-Contest] Signal Report

[Paul J. Piercey]

True, but, on average, how many Qs in a contest station's log are from raw
non-contesters? The bulk are from stations that have previously been in at
least one contest and have some interest and knowledge of what's going on.
This is where Randy's SCP comes in. If you make a contact with a raw
non-contester, as in someone who hasn't been in any/many contests in the
past and is not on the list, some manner of legitimizing it should be
available. Perhap you can have your log generate a whole new number.

73 -- Paul VO1HE
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tessmer [mailto:mtessmer at mindspring.com] 
> Sent: December 12, 2008 02:47
> To: p.piercey at nl.rogers.com; kzerohb at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report
> 
> And, as is always the case in discussions like this, the 
> presumption that only contesters participate in contests.  
> 
> 
> 73, Mike K9NW
> 
> 
> ---------------
> I abso-tively >>LOVE<< it Paul.
> 
> No way for the receiver to get a good Q except to copy it in 
> real time without any software crutch.
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey at nl.rogers.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:34 PM
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report
> 
> > Like I said before... What's wrong with a random number? 
> Your logging 
> > program issues one that you pass on to the other station 
> and his does 
> > the same for him to send to you. No more mindless 59 5 or 
> enn e junk. 
> > No prefilling of the exchange. You'd have to be able to pay as much 
> > attention in the 47th hour as you would in the 1st. Rates 
> would drop 
> > but it'd also be more interesting.
> 
>  
> 
> 
>