[CQ-Contest] pulic logs - I agree w/K1AR
kr2q at optimum.net
kr2q at optimum.net
Thu Dec 25 13:29:36 EST 2008
Yes, this HAS been beaten to death. (caps for emphasis, not yelling)
The earliest comment I can find in the archive is from 1994:
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00068.html
A "good" posting is from Dick Norton dated "way back when" where Dick states some opinions
and cites an article on OPEN LOGS in March/April NCJ 1991.
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00077.html
More recently---
>From 2008, this was beaten to death again in March and end of August - Beginning of Sept.
In case you missed it, here was my contribution back then:
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00041.html
OF NOTE,
1. Since my post cited above, ARRL has rescinded its opinion that QSOs from public logs
won't be accepted for DXCC credit. Nice.
2. The comment about "Hans" in the cited post was applicable back then, not now.
Maybe the list moderators could limit the certain categories of posts to "once a year?"
a. open logs
b. cut numbers
c. stealing my frequency or other "rude" behavior
d. lots of the others.....
MX es HNY!
de Doug KR2Q
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list