[CQ-Contest] rules

Dale Putnam daleputnam at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 4 14:02:40 EDT 2008

I oon't usually like the "me too" posts... but this one seems to hit the nail...directly...
with no side effects.... and doesn't offend me... has all the positive needed, no negative.
Way to go Eric!--... ...--Dale - WC7S in Wy> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:10:31 -0400> From: eric at k3na.org> To: k5zd at contesting.com> CC: cq-contest at contesting.com> Subject: [CQ-Contest] rules> > Hi Randy et al --> > We are seeing a blizzard of rules proposals and counter-proposals. > But we don't actually know if there is a "problem" yet with CW skimmers.> > Rather than changing rules, let's do this:> > 1. For the next two years, when reporting a score, also answer this > question:> "Did you use a CW Skimmer or its equivalent?"> This question applies to all entrants: single op and multi-op.> > 2. Publish the line scores with a mark indicating the answer to that > question.> > 3. In 2010 June, review the results of the past two years to determine> a) Does the use of a CW skimmer have a material impact on scores?> b) If yes, do the award categories need to be changed in some way? > Or is disclosure sufficient?> > -- Eric K3NA> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
It’s easy to add contacts from Facebook and other social sites through Windows Live™ Messenger. Learn how.

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list